I set off on a damp morning to the V&A. My friend Patou and I had arranged to meet there to visit the Mary Quant exhibition, of which we have heard good things. Mary Quant came to prominence in the early 60s as a designer and entrepreneur, and name and her face were familiar to me throughout my childhood when the mini skirt was de rigueur.

Sassoon and Quant

However, fate intervened, and when I reached South Kensington, it was to find a message on my ‘phone to say Patou could not join me. It might have been more fun going round the exhibition with her, but I had a wonderful time on my own all the same.

Although Quant’s fashions would have been splashed across magazines, those magazines would generally have been of the glossier kind that rarely came my mother’s way. So it was with something of a shock that I realised how much Quant had influenced the clothing I wore or saw older cousins and neighbours wearing as I was growing up. Apart from mini skirts, there were shift dresses, pinafore dresses, boxy suits, and pin striped materials previously the province of men’s suits.


When I was at the Vice Versa exhibition in the Ulster Museum last summer, fortunate enough to have a tour with the exhibition’s curator, Charlotte McReynolds, it was clear fashion is very much part of social history. So it proved again at the V&A. At McReynolds 2018 exhibition Fashion & Feminism she included a quote by Quant: “Clothes always say it first, you know, then comes the effect.” That desire to get away from restrictive clothing, to be comfortable, to be gleeful, was all part of the emerging sixties youth culture. Quant does not claim to have invented the mini skirt, she says it was a street fashion, invented by the girls on the Kings’ road where she had her shop Bazaar.

Mary Quant

Not that I was aware of any of this growing up. My childhood in Guildford might have been only thirty miles from London, but the images of the Kings Road then might just as well have been from another planet.

Still, some influences obviously made it down the A3. I had a Ladybird pinafore dress in black watch tartan that I loved and wore for years. As I grew taller, skirts got shorter, so until I finally started to fill out, I wore dresses saying they were to fit an eight-year-old well into my fourteenth year. I think I got the pinafore dress when I was around seven. It had a low waist and a pleated skirt. It was great. I could do anything in it, totally adaptable and unrestrictive, rather like the Ladybird jeans I inherited from my sister who had been bought them when they were several sizes too big when she was still a toddler when the holiday she and my parents were on turned wet and windy. Come to think of it, a lot of my favourite clothes were Ladybird. There’s a photograph of me wearing it somewhere, but it may be one my sister has as I don’t remember seeing it for a long time.

So it was with a slight shock of recognition that I saw a similar shaped garment for an adult woman.

Well this explains it

The waist on my pinafore dress wasn’t as low as this!

By an odd coincidence I was also wearing a pinafore dress today. This autumn I added two to my wardrobe, the first I have owned as an adult. One of them is tartan, and my childhood pinafore dress definitely influenced ny decision to buy it. Oh I have just remembered my beloved reefer jacket. Maybe I shall go all retro and get one of those too.

The clothes in the exhibition jogged memories of clothes I have long forgotten, particularly dresses; the shift dress I got for my tenth birthday; a dark blue woollen dress with three quarter length sleeves that was reduced at Marks and Spencer and which I wore into my teens; even my primary school uniform summer dress seemed to be Quant influenced (we all had the same fabric but could choose the design, made by in my case by my long suffering mother who did not particularly enjoy sewing). I was confirmed in my teens and, having finally outgrown all the clothes in my slender wardrobe, wore another pinafore dress, a much sleeker one, like a long waistcoat in grey pinstripe wool. Again the Quant influence.

City pinafore style

I had a neighbour some eight years older than me, so as a child an enormous age gap. I remember her wearing little suits with boxy jackets, boat necked dresses, a simple wool coat. Her hair was a straight uncompromising bob.She didn’t dress like her mother or like the other girls of her age in my road: she had been Quantified. I wasn’t the only one having my memories stirred. They were a number of women, and quite a few men, who I reckon were about a decade older than me, gazing and reminiscing. The paper bags, how can I have forgotten them? Glorious carriers with bright floral designs.

That daisy logo

There were some German teenagers there, giggling, as teenagers do when they see pictures of past youth dancing and playing, but I noticed that some lingered behind their peers to look more intently at the displays and to take pictures.

Different shapes

Go if you can, it’s on until 16th February and for a blast from the past it has a great feel of fresh air.

13 thoughts on “Quantifiable

  1. My goodness you have taken me back Isobel! I remember her range of clothes all dyed with tea. Beautiful! In my early teaching days in Islington, I would spend Saturday mornings visiting Quant, Biba, the Kings road and Carnaby Street. If short of cash (most frequently), I would buy some material and get my sewing machine out to make copies. Those mini skirts were so awkward when sitting on the bus!

  2. Oh, Isobel! Your account on Quant’s exhibition has brought me back to my teens, when her designs influenced our dresses, skirts and jeans or trousers and opened wide doors and windows of daily comfort and brightness in young female dressing!

  3. What a delightful post, Isobel. In the early 60’s I was working at a fabric store, helping women choose fabrics for these new styles – and of course trying them myself. I was entering young adulthood with a couple of years of university, marriage and children soon on the way so I didn’t have much energy to focus on fashion but her styles sure impacted on my choice of clothing.

    • In love the way this post has jogged memories for us all. I realised with something of a shock yesterday that the designs Quant had created were still popular and their origins recognisable several years later, which I got them in Ladybird form! She made a very big impact.

  4. I definitely made that red one with the front pleat and of the tote bag in what was called “home arts” in my middle school years when all good young ladies had to learn sewing and cookery whilst the young men did “shop”.

      • Browsing through the Mary Quant Exhibition Web site I think I have had a glimpse of Twiggy. Was she one of the models that presented Quant’s creations?
        I have also spotted a dress which, most probably, my dressmaker at that time (!!!) copied for me in black and white. It’s been an instant return to my nineteens!

      • “Shop” would be the manly arts – automobile repair, wood-working, welding, printing (as in printing press). To put the best gloss on it, the schools were making an attempt to teach us life skills – shortly after my middle school years these courses became co-ed. Or it was instilling our gender stereotypes and making some lame attempt to provide vocational training for the working class. I think budget cuts have pretty much decimated all such course work these days.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.